sometimes its actually funny to watch this man pretend that he knows more about the law than actual lawyers.
does he argue simply to argue?
does he have a strange belief that if he says it's no so enough it will stop being so?
but more specifically, for such a flag-waving patriot and broadcaster for many years, how on earth could he be so ignorant about the first amendment even when his own fox news cohort is telling him hes flat wrong?
